Mortgage costs a mystery to most Canadians
Amid
the new world of mortgage options -- interest-only payments, no down payments,
and 40-year amortization periods -- a Manulife Bank Canada survey says fewer
than one-third of Canadian homeowners understand how much their mortgage will
cost them.
"That is a staggering figure. We
have a lot of work ahead," said Adrian Mastracci, financial adviser with Vancouver-based
KCM Wealth Management Inc. "Paying off loans slowly, especially
non-deductible ones, is one of the biggest impediments to accumulating the
retirement nest egg."
He points out that with a $100,000 mortgage at 6.0 per cent calculated
semi-annually, your payments are $565 a month and you pay $137,400 in interest
over 35 years. But if you increase your monthly payments to $640, you can knock
a decade off your mortgage, and spend only $91,900 in interest over 25 years.
Furthermore, if you can manage payments of $840 a month, you will pay off the
mortgage in 15 years and spend only $51,200 on interest.
Yet a number of movements within the
past year or so have actually enticed homebuyers and homeowners to take on more
and riskier debt, and pay it off slowly if at all. Things started when Canada
Mortgage and Housing Corp. said it would offer mortgage insurance for
interest-only loans, where no principal is paid off, while also offering
insurance for amortization periods up to 35 years, compared to the traditional
25. Then the other major mortgage insurer in
In October, CIBC World Markets released
a report showing there had been a 50 per cent increase in sub-prime mortgages.
These mortgages often have weaker requirements, and are offered to new
immigrants without a Canadian credit history, the self-employed without proven
incomes, and to people with poor credit ratings.
While mortgage insurers and lenders say
all these innovations are allowing more Canadians to buy more house earlier in
life, critics argue that they are pushing Canadians into a quagmire of debt
that will result in mortgage defaults and housing foreclosures.
Bank of Canada governor David Dodge
blasted CMHC, saying that interest-only and 35-year loans would drive up home
prices and make them less affordable for Canadians, contradicting the expressed
mandate of the Crown corporation. And while home ownership is usually
championed because it builds up equity in a normally appreciating asset, many
of these innovations allow little if any equity to accrue, causing critics to
argue that those people would be better off renting.
"It worries me," said Moshe
Milevsky, finance professor at
Five years ago, Milevsky's study of
five-year rolling interest rates during the previous 50 years showed that 88.6
per cent of the time homeowners would have saved money with floating rather
than fixed-rate mortgages, specifically an average of $22,000 on a $100,000
mortgage amortized over 15 years. Today's flat bond yield curve, which means
you're paying only one-half to one per cent extra to lock in a rate long term,
makes fixed rates much more attractive than five years ago.
"A new home owner putting in the
minimum amount might need the insurance and maybe they should go fixed,"
said Milevsky. "But if I have a substantial down payment and can tolerate
the fluctuations, I don't need the insurance."
About 40 per cent of Canadians
currently have floating-rate mortgages.
Meanwhile, the Canadian Institute of Mortgage Brokers and Lenders estimates
homeowners in this country will have $808 billion in outstanding mortgage loans
on residential real estate in 2007.
This
article is protected by copyright and is licensed only for your personal use.
All other rights are reserved. This article may not be reproduced,
retransmitted, disseminated, sold, distributed, published, broadcast or circulated
without the prior written consent of CanWest Global Interactive Inc.